Chapter VIII - RECIPROCAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR ASSISTANCE IN CERTAIN MATTERS AND PROCEDURE FOR ATTACHMENT AND FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY (From Section 111 to Section 124)
Unsoundness of mind requires acquittal findings to state explicitly whether the accused committed the act. Where a person is acquitted because, by reason of unsoundness of mind, he was incapable of knowing the nature of the act alleged or that it was wrong or contrary to law, the finding must state specifically whether he committed the act or not.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Unsoundness of mind requires acquittal findings to state explicitly whether the accused committed the act.
Where a person is acquitted because, by reason of unsoundness of mind, he was incapable of knowing the nature of the act alleged or that it was wrong or contrary to law, the finding must state specifically whether he committed the act or not.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.