Chapter VIII - RECIPROCAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR ASSISTANCE IN CERTAIN MATTERS AND PROCEDURE FOR ATTACHMENT AND FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY (From Section 111 to Section 124)
Documentary evidence from designated mint and forensic officers is admissible though the reporting officer need not be called as witness. Reports signed by designated gazetted officers of Mints, Note Printing Presses, Security Printing Presses, specified Forensic Departments or Examiners of Questioned Documents are admissible as documentary evidence in proceedings under the Sanhita even if the officer is not called as a witness. The court may summon the officer regarding the report but cannot compel production of the records underlying the report. An officer cannot be required, without permission of the head of the institution, to give evidence from unpublished official records or disclose the particulars of tests used in the examination.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Documentary evidence from designated mint and forensic officers is admissible though the reporting officer need not be called as witness.
Reports signed by designated gazetted officers of Mints, Note Printing Presses, Security Printing Presses, specified Forensic Departments or Examiners of Questioned Documents are admissible as documentary evidence in proceedings under the Sanhita even if the officer is not called as a witness. The court may summon the officer regarding the report but cannot compel production of the records underlying the report. An officer cannot be required, without permission of the head of the institution, to give evidence from unpublished official records or disclose the particulars of tests used in the examination.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.