Chapter VIII - RECIPROCAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR ASSISTANCE IN CERTAIN MATTERS AND PROCEDURE FOR ATTACHMENT AND FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY (From Section 111 to Section 124)
Jurisdictional conflict: higher forum determines which district should conduct the inquiry and other proceedings are discontinued. When multiple courts have taken cognizance of the same offence and there is doubt about which should inquire or try it, the matter is decided by the High Court: the common High Court if the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, or the High Court whose appellate criminal jurisdiction first saw the proceedings; other proceedings are then discontinued.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Jurisdictional conflict: higher forum determines which district should conduct the inquiry and other proceedings are discontinued.
When multiple courts have taken cognizance of the same offence and there is doubt about which should inquire or try it, the matter is decided by the High Court: the common High Court if the courts are subordinate to the same High Court, or the High Court whose appellate criminal jurisdiction first saw the proceedings; other proceedings are then discontinued.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
