Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Acts & Rules
of of All Acts & Rules
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Judges Lose Strict Numerical Threshold for Constitutional Law Review After 1978 Amendment</h1> The statutory provision originally specified minimum requirements for Supreme Court judges to determine constitutional validity of laws. It mandated a minimum of seven judges and required a two-thirds majority to declare a central or state law unconstitutional. However, this article was subsequently omitted by the 43rd Constitutional Amendment Act in 1978, effectively removing these specific procedural constraints on judicial review of legislative validity.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
