Invalidity of inconsistent laws: state enactments that abridge fundamental rights are void to that extent. Laws conflicting with Fundamental Rights are void to the extent of inconsistency; the State cannot enact laws that take away or abridge those rights. 'Law' is defined broadly to include ordinances, orders, bye laws, rules, regulations, notifications, customs or usages with the force of law, and 'laws in force' covers prior enactments even if not presently operative in all areas. A specified constitutional exception excludes amendments made under the constitution's amending procedure from this invalidation rule.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Invalidity of inconsistent laws: state enactments that abridge fundamental rights are void to that extent.
Laws conflicting with Fundamental Rights are void to the extent of inconsistency; the State cannot enact laws that take away or abridge those rights. "Law" is defined broadly to include ordinances, orders, bye laws, rules, regulations, notifications, customs or usages with the force of law, and "laws in force" covers prior enactments even if not presently operative in all areas. A specified constitutional exception excludes amendments made under the constitution's amending procedure from this invalidation rule.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.