Constitutional review limitation: High Courts barred from testing central laws' validity in Article 226 proceedings, later rescinded. Article 226A restricted High Courts from examining the constitutional validity of Central laws in Article 226 proceedings; it was inserted by amendment, later omitted by a subsequent amendment, and a transitional provision treated pending proceedings as if the omission had been effective from the earlier commencement date, thereby addressing the temporal application of the limitation and its removal.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Constitutional review limitation: High Courts barred from testing central laws' validity in Article 226 proceedings, later rescinded.
Article 226A restricted High Courts from examining the constitutional validity of Central laws in Article 226 proceedings; it was inserted by amendment, later omitted by a subsequent amendment, and a transitional provision treated pending proceedings as if the omission had been effective from the earlier commencement date, thereby addressing the temporal application of the limitation and its removal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.