<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>[Omitted] Constitutional validity of Central laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 226</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=9266</link>
    <description>Article 226A restricted High Courts from examining the constitutional validity of Central laws in Article 226 proceedings; it was inserted by amendment, later omitted by a subsequent amendment, and a transitional provision treated pending proceedings as if the omission had been effective from the earlier commencement date, thereby addressing the temporal application of the limitation and its removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:31:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 18:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=246015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>[Omitted] Constitutional validity of Central laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 226</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=9266</link>
      <description>Article 226A restricted High Courts from examining the constitutional validity of Central laws in Article 226 proceedings; it was inserted by amendment, later omitted by a subsequent amendment, and a transitional provision treated pending proceedings as if the omission had been effective from the earlier commencement date, thereby addressing the temporal application of the limitation and its removal.</description>
      <category>Act-Rules</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 14:31:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/acts?id=9266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>