Interpretation of High Court jurisdiction clarifies how references to governors, approvals and consolidated funds are construed. Where a High Court exercises jurisdiction across more than one State or a State and an area outside that State, references in the Chapter to the Governor regarding Judges are read as references to the Governor of the State where the Court has its principal seat; approvals for subordinate court rules, forms and tables are construed as approvals by the appropriate local authority where the subordinate court is situate; and references to the Consolidated Fund are read as those of the State in which the Court has its principal seat.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Interpretation of High Court jurisdiction clarifies how references to governors, approvals and consolidated funds are construed.
Where a High Court exercises jurisdiction across more than one State or a State and an area outside that State, references in the Chapter to the Governor regarding Judges are read as references to the Governor of the State where the Court has its principal seat; approvals for subordinate court rules, forms and tables are construed as approvals by the appropriate local authority where the subordinate court is situate; and references to the Consolidated Fund are read as those of the State in which the Court has its principal seat.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.