Contumacy procedure: refusal to answer before an appointed officer leads to report and same treatment as refusal before the judge. If an examinee refuses to answer to the satisfaction of an officer appointed under the company court rules, the officer must make a written report in Form No. 115 stating the questions put and any answers given, notify the examinee of when to attend before the Judge, and submit the report; upon receipt the Judge may act and the examinee is to be treated as if he had defaulted in answering before the Judge.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Contumacy procedure: refusal to answer before an appointed officer leads to report and same treatment as refusal before the judge.
If an examinee refuses to answer to the satisfaction of an officer appointed under the company court rules, the officer must make a written report in Form No. 115 stating the questions put and any answers given, notify the examinee of when to attend before the Judge, and submit the report; upon receipt the Judge may act and the examinee is to be treated as if he had defaulted in answering before the Judge.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.