Adequate consideration requires a fair equivalent value; affection-based transfers may not meet adequacy for valuation purposes. Adequate consideration denotes a fair equivalent in value, requiring a reasonably just and equitable exchange; for specific performance the contract price must be substantially just and fair. Mere love and affection may constitute good consideration for contract formation but do not satisfy adequacy when adequacy is required for valuation or tax purposes.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Adequate consideration requires a fair equivalent value; affection-based transfers may not meet adequacy for valuation purposes.
Adequate consideration denotes a fair equivalent in value, requiring a reasonably just and equitable exchange; for specific performance the contract price must be substantially just and fair. Mere love and affection may constitute good consideration for contract formation but do not satisfy adequacy when adequacy is required for valuation or tax purposes.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.