Binding precedent under Article 141 requires applying the ratio decidendi, not incidental factual findings. The law declared by the Supreme Court binds all courts through the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal principle applied to the facts, not incidental factual findings or individualized sentencing conclusions. Only reasoned principles that address the legal issue in question constitute binding precedent; statements devoid of express reasoning or consideration of the issue do not constitute law declared.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Binding precedent under Article 141 requires applying the ratio decidendi, not incidental factual findings.
The law declared by the Supreme Court binds all courts through the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal principle applied to the facts, not incidental factual findings or individualized sentencing conclusions. Only reasoned principles that address the legal issue in question constitute binding precedent; statements devoid of express reasoning or consideration of the issue do not constitute law declared.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.