Substantive evidence persuades the trier of fact on issues, distinct from impeachment evidence that discredits witnesses. Substantive evidence is evidence offered to prove a fact in issue and to persuade the trier of fact on propositions determining the tribunal's decision, contrasted with impeachment evidence which is designed to discredit a witness and diminish the effectiveness of his testimony; character evidence or prior acts may, when offered to prove guilt or innocence, operate as substantive evidence rather than merely as impeachment.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Substantive evidence persuades the trier of fact on issues, distinct from impeachment evidence that discredits witnesses.
Substantive evidence is evidence offered to prove a fact in issue and to persuade the trier of fact on propositions determining the tribunal's decision, contrasted with impeachment evidence which is designed to discredit a witness and diminish the effectiveness of his testimony; character evidence or prior acts may, when offered to prove guilt or innocence, operate as substantive evidence rather than merely as impeachment.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.