Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court clarifies 'is' can mean present, future, or past depending on statutory context and legislative intent</h1> The expression 'is' typically carries present signification but can contextually denote future or past meanings. Supreme Court jurisprudence establishes that while 'is' normally refers to the present tense, it may indicate future occurrences or past events depending on statutory context. In arbitration matters, courts recognized that 'is' can encompass agreements coming into existence during pending proceedings, not just pre-existing ones. The interpretation requires contextual analysis to determine true legislative intent, as confirmed in multiple Supreme Court decisions involving arbitration law and taxation matters.