Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Marginal notes have minimal importance in constitutional interpretation and cannot override substantive Article 368 amendment provisions</h1> A Supreme Court case addressed the interpretation of marginal notes in constitutional provisions, specifically regarding Article 368 dealing with constitutional amendments. The Court held that marginal notes should have minimal importance in construing constitutional provisions, even less than in statutory interpretation. The justices emphasized that the language of Article 368 was plain and unambiguous, making construction rules unnecessary. They clarified that while the marginal note referenced 'procedure for amendment,' this did not negate the implied power to amend contained within the Article itself, establishing that marginal notes cannot override the substantive content of constitutional provisions.