Judicial non-interference preserves arbitral autonomy by limiting court intervention to statutory exceptions and tribunal-determined issues. The principle of judicial non-interference requires arbitral proceedings to be governed by party agreement and tribunal direction, with the tribunal having primary authority to determine law, contract construction, jurisdiction and scope of authority; national courts may intervene only to the extent expressly permitted by the governing statute or framework, thereby limiting judicial oversight in favour of arbitral primacy subject to statutory carve-outs.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Judicial non-interference preserves arbitral autonomy by limiting court intervention to statutory exceptions and tribunal-determined issues.
The principle of judicial non-interference requires arbitral proceedings to be governed by party agreement and tribunal direction, with the tribunal having primary authority to determine law, contract construction, jurisdiction and scope of authority; national courts may intervene only to the extent expressly permitted by the governing statute or framework, thereby limiting judicial oversight in favour of arbitral primacy subject to statutory carve-outs.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.