Commonsense construction rule: prefer interpretations that avoid absurd or anomalous results and reflect legislative intention. The commonsense construction rule directs courts to prefer statutory interpretations that reflect common sense and legislative intention, applying a presumption against absurdity to reject constructions that are unworkable, impracticable, anomalous, illogical, or disproportionate. A related presumption against anomalous result requires avoidance of constructions that create inconsistencies between like cases or make outcomes turn on immaterial distinctions; where each construction produces anomalies the court must balance them and may exercise discretion unless the anomaly plainly expresses legislative intent.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Commonsense construction rule: prefer interpretations that avoid absurd or anomalous results and reflect legislative intention.
The commonsense construction rule directs courts to prefer statutory interpretations that reflect common sense and legislative intention, applying a presumption against absurdity to reject constructions that are unworkable, impracticable, anomalous, illogical, or disproportionate. A related presumption against anomalous result requires avoidance of constructions that create inconsistencies between like cases or make outcomes turn on immaterial distinctions; where each construction produces anomalies the court must balance them and may exercise discretion unless the anomaly plainly expresses legislative intent.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.