Misconduct: wilful transgression of definite rules, distinct from negligence, including unlawful acts or failures in public duties. Misconduct denotes a wilful transgression of an established and definite rule or a forbidden act, implying wrongful intention and excluding mere negligence or carelessness. Misconduct in office describes unlawful behaviour or neglect by a public officer related to official duties, including unauthorized acts, improper performance, or failures to act where there is an affirmative duty; characterization depends on the duty's nature and whether the conduct was wilful rather than negligent.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Misconduct: wilful transgression of definite rules, distinct from negligence, including unlawful acts or failures in public duties.
Misconduct denotes a wilful transgression of an established and definite rule or a forbidden act, implying wrongful intention and excluding mere negligence or carelessness. Misconduct in office describes unlawful behaviour or neglect by a public officer related to official duties, including unauthorized acts, improper performance, or failures to act where there is an affirmative duty; characterization depends on the duty's nature and whether the conduct was wilful rather than negligent.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.