Bias: reasonable apprehension of impartiality bars decisions when circumstances create a real likelihood of prejudice. The doctrine of bias invalidates action where there is a reasonable possibility that a decision maker is predisposed against a party. Three forms-subject matter, pecuniary and personal-are recognised; courts apply a fact sensitive test of real likelihood or reasonable apprehension evaluated from the viewpoint of a reasonable informed person, requiring cogent positive evidence rather than conjecture.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Bias: reasonable apprehension of impartiality bars decisions when circumstances create a real likelihood of prejudice.
The doctrine of bias invalidates action where there is a reasonable possibility that a decision maker is predisposed against a party. Three forms-subject matter, pecuniary and personal-are recognised; courts apply a fact sensitive test of real likelihood or reasonable apprehension evaluated from the viewpoint of a reasonable informed person, requiring cogent positive evidence rather than conjecture.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.