Stare decisis limits reopening settled law but permits reconsideration for public policy or remedying continued injustice. The doctrine of stare decisis obliges courts and statutory tribunals to follow prior competent decisions to ensure legal certainty, and cautions against disturbing settled law absent palpable error. It is not absolute: larger benches may revisit earlier rulings for reasons such as public policy, public good, or to remedy continued injustice, and precedents frame the tests for when such reconsideration is appropriate.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Stare decisis limits reopening settled law but permits reconsideration for public policy or remedying continued injustice.
The doctrine of stare decisis obliges courts and statutory tribunals to follow prior competent decisions to ensure legal certainty, and cautions against disturbing settled law absent palpable error. It is not absolute: larger benches may revisit earlier rulings for reasons such as public policy, public good, or to remedy continued injustice, and precedents frame the tests for when such reconsideration is appropriate.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.