Sufficient cause: requires an adequate, non negligent explanation for delay before discretionary condonation is granted. The document explains that 'sufficient cause' requires an adequate explanation for delay excluding negligence, inaction or lack of bona fides, and that courts must scrutinise such explanations to ensure they are not devices to cover ulterior motives; liberal interpretation is available only where negligence or mala fide conduct cannot be imputed, and the expression cannot be used to justify prolonged or unexplained delays contrary to the policy of speedy dispute resolution.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Sufficient cause: requires an adequate, non negligent explanation for delay before discretionary condonation is granted.
The document explains that "sufficient cause" requires an adequate explanation for delay excluding negligence, inaction or lack of bona fides, and that courts must scrutinise such explanations to ensure they are not devices to cover ulterior motives; liberal interpretation is available only where negligence or mala fide conduct cannot be imputed, and the expression cannot be used to justify prolonged or unexplained delays contrary to the policy of speedy dispute resolution.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.