Malfeasance, misfeasance and non-feasance distinctions define wrongful acts, omissions, public-law duties, liability and remedial consequences. Definitions distinguish three modes of wrongful official conduct: malfeasance is the commission of an act that is positively unlawful; misfeasance is the improper performance of a lawful act; and non-feasance is the omission or total failure to perform a duty that ought to be performed. Stroud cautions against treating misfeasance as a separate wrongful act and rejects non-feasance as excusing liability for certain public-way nuisances.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Malfeasance, misfeasance and non-feasance distinctions define wrongful acts, omissions, public-law duties, liability and remedial consequences.
Definitions distinguish three modes of wrongful official conduct: malfeasance is the commission of an act that is positively unlawful; misfeasance is the improper performance of a lawful act; and non-feasance is the omission or total failure to perform a duty that ought to be performed. Stroud cautions against treating misfeasance as a separate wrongful act and rejects non-feasance as excusing liability for certain public-way nuisances.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.