Supposition as a legal concept denotes conjecture without proof, not a substitute for evidence in legal reasoning. Supposition denotes a conjecture grounded in possibility or probability rather than proven fact; it operates as a non evidentiary assertion that a thing could or may have occurred without proof that it did. In legal terminology this concept is employed in explanatory materials, manuals, ready reckoners and reference guides to frame hypothetical scenarios, but it does not function as proof or a factual finding.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supposition as a legal concept denotes conjecture without proof, not a substitute for evidence in legal reasoning.
Supposition denotes a conjecture grounded in possibility or probability rather than proven fact; it operates as a non evidentiary assertion that a thing could or may have occurred without proof that it did. In legal terminology this concept is employed in explanatory materials, manuals, ready reckoners and reference guides to frame hypothetical scenarios, but it does not function as proof or a factual finding.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.