1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Manuals
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Manuals
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Articles 246 and 254 doctrine of occupied field requires actual conflict between central and state laws for operation</h1> Articles 246 and 254 of the Constitution establish the doctrine of occupied field, requiring state legislation to yield to central/parliamentary legislation when both cannot coexist. The Supreme Court clarified that this doctrine applies only when there is actual conflict between central and state laws in overlapping areas, not merely because both legislate on the same subject matter. Real collision between enactments must exist for the doctrine to operate. Where laws can coexist peacefully without irreconcilable conflict, both remain valid. However, Article 254(2) may allow state law to prevail if presidential assent is obtained, and the doctrine doesn't completely bar states from making incidental laws on subjects within central domain.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
