Class action admissibility considers impracticable joinder, common issues, typical representative claims, and risk of inconsistent outcomes. When assessing admissibility under section 245(4), the Tribunal must consider whether a class action is appropriate by examining impracticability of individual joinder, common questions of law or fact, typicality of representative claims or defences, and adequacy of representation; and whether separate actions would risk inconsistent adjudications, dispositive outcomes for other members, or substantial impairment of other members' ability to protect their interests.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Class action admissibility considers impracticable joinder, common issues, typical representative claims, and risk of inconsistent outcomes.
When assessing admissibility under section 245(4), the Tribunal must consider whether a class action is appropriate by examining impracticability of individual joinder, common questions of law or fact, typicality of representative claims or defences, and adequacy of representation; and whether separate actions would risk inconsistent adjudications, dispositive outcomes for other members, or substantial impairment of other members' ability to protect their interests.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.