Penalty for not accounting for goods: person-in-charge liable when unloading failures or quantity shortfalls remain unaccounted. Section 116 imposes liability on the person-in-charge of a conveyance when goods loaded for importation, transhipment, or coastal carriage are not unloaded at their Indian destination or are unloaded in deficient quantity and the shortfall is not accounted for to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner of Customs. Penalties are pegged to the duty that would have been chargeable on the unaccounted goods, with separate treatment for imported/transhipped goods and for coastal goods.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Penalty for not accounting for goods: person-in-charge liable when unloading failures or quantity shortfalls remain unaccounted.
Section 116 imposes liability on the person-in-charge of a conveyance when goods loaded for importation, transhipment, or coastal carriage are not unloaded at their Indian destination or are unloaded in deficient quantity and the shortfall is not accounted for to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner of Customs. Penalties are pegged to the duty that would have been chargeable on the unaccounted goods, with separate treatment for imported/transhipped goods and for coastal goods.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.