Liability for abettor when a different but probable act occurs - abettor treated as if they abetted that act. When one act is abetted but a different act is committed, the abettor is liable for the act done to the same extent as if they had directly abetted it, provided the act was a probable consequence of the abetment and was committed under the influence of the instigation, or with the aid of, or in pursuance of, the conspiracy constituting the abetment.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Liability for abettor when a different but probable act occurs - abettor treated as if they abetted that act.
When one act is abetted but a different act is committed, the abettor is liable for the act done to the same extent as if they had directly abetted it, provided the act was a probable consequence of the abetment and was committed under the influence of the instigation, or with the aid of, or in pursuance of, the conspiracy constituting the abetment.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.