Clarifying ambiguous document language: extrinsic evidence may determine the intended meaning of illegible or peculiar terms in writing. Evidence is admissible to establish the meaning of illegible or not commonly intelligible characters and of foreign, obsolete, technical, local or regional expressions, abbreviations, and words used in a peculiar sense, permitting extrinsic proof to resolve ambiguities in a document (for example, determining whether a written term like 'mods' refers to models or modelling tools).
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Clarifying ambiguous document language: extrinsic evidence may determine the intended meaning of illegible or peculiar terms in writing.
Evidence is admissible to establish the meaning of illegible or not commonly intelligible characters and of foreign, obsolete, technical, local or regional expressions, abbreviations, and words used in a peculiar sense, permitting extrinsic proof to resolve ambiguities in a document (for example, determining whether a written term like "mods" refers to models or modelling tools).
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.