Document interpretation allows extrinsic evidence when plain language is unmeaning to establish a peculiar contextual sense. When the literal wording of a document is plain but unmeaning with respect to existing facts, evidence may be given to show the language was used in a peculiar sense; factual proof of possession and local circumstances may identify the true property intended by the parties.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Document interpretation allows extrinsic evidence when plain language is unmeaning to establish a peculiar contextual sense.
When the literal wording of a document is plain but unmeaning with respect to existing facts, evidence may be given to show the language was used in a peculiar sense; factual proof of possession and local circumstances may identify the true property intended by the parties.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.