Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Acts & Rules
of of All Acts & Rules
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Section 95: Oral Evidence Limited When Terms Documented Under Section 94, Except for Exceptions Like Fraud or Mistake.</h1> Section 95 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, addresses the exclusion of oral evidence when the terms of a contract or legal document have been documented as per Section 94. Oral agreements cannot contradict, vary, add, or subtract from the documented terms unless they prove factors like fraud or mistake. Exceptions allow for proving separate oral agreements on matters not covered by the document, conditions precedent, subsequent modifications, customary practices, or the relationship of document language to facts. Illustrations clarify scenarios where oral evidence is inadmissible or permissible based on these provisions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
