Relevancy of connected facts extends to events forming the same transaction, even when occurring at different times or places. Section 4 provides that facts not in issue are relevant when so connected with a fact in issue or a relevant fact as to form part of the same transaction, and that such relevancy is unaffected by differences in time or place; illustrations include contemporaneous statements at a beating, constituent incidents of an insurrection, related letters in a correspondence, and successive deliveries through intermediaries.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Relevancy of connected facts extends to events forming the same transaction, even when occurring at different times or places.
Section 4 provides that facts not in issue are relevant when so connected with a fact in issue or a relevant fact as to form part of the same transaction, and that such relevancy is unaffected by differences in time or place; illustrations include contemporaneous statements at a beating, constituent incidents of an insurrection, related letters in a correspondence, and successive deliveries through intermediaries.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.