Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Facts Supporting or Contradicting Expert Opinions Gain Relevance if They Corroborate or Challenge Pertinent Expert Testimony.</h1> Facts that are not directly relevant become relevant if they support or contradict expert opinions when those opinions are pertinent. For instance, if determining whether an individual was poisoned by a specific substance, the symptoms exhibited by others poisoned by the same substance are relevant. Similarly, if assessing whether a sea-wall caused a harbor obstruction, the occurrence of obstructions in other similarly situated harbors without such sea-walls is relevant. This provision emphasizes the importance of corroborating or challenging expert opinions with factual evidence in legal proceedings.