Parol evidence rule limits oral proof of contract terms where terms are in writing, subject to narrow exceptions. When terms of a contract, grant or other disposition of property are reduced to a document, proof of those terms is limited to the document itself or admissible secondary evidence; this applies whether in one or more documents and where multiple originals exist only one need be proved. Exceptions allow proof without the writing in specified situations, including appointment of a public officer who has acted, wills proved by probate, and admission of oral evidence for facts collateral to those embodied in the document.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Parol evidence rule limits oral proof of contract terms where terms are in writing, subject to narrow exceptions.
When terms of a contract, grant or other disposition of property are reduced to a document, proof of those terms is limited to the document itself or admissible secondary evidence; this applies whether in one or more documents and where multiple originals exist only one need be proved. Exceptions allow proof without the writing in specified situations, including appointment of a public officer who has acted, wills proved by probate, and admission of oral evidence for facts collateral to those embodied in the document.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.