Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Section 100: Clarify Ambiguous Document Language with Evidence for Accurate Fact Application in Legal Contexts</h1> Section 100 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, addresses situations where language in a document partially applies to two different sets of facts, but not entirely to either. In such cases, evidence can be introduced to clarify which set of facts the language was intended to apply to. For example, if a person agrees to sell land described ambiguously, evidence can be presented to determine the intended land for sale. This provision is part of the broader principle of excluding oral evidence when documentary evidence is available, ensuring clarity in contractual and legal interpretations.