Oral admissions of document contents are irrelevant unless admissible via secondary evidence or genuineness is challenged. Oral admissions of a document's contents are not relevant unless the proponent demonstrates entitlement to give secondary evidence of those contents under the applicable rules, or unless the genuineness of the document produced is questioned.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Oral admissions of document contents are irrelevant unless admissible via secondary evidence or genuineness is challenged.
Oral admissions of a document's contents are not relevant unless the proponent demonstrates entitlement to give secondary evidence of those contents under the applicable rules, or unless the genuineness of the document produced is questioned.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.