Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Acts & Rules
of of All Acts & Rules
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Employers Not Liable for Indemnifying Agents in Criminal Acts Under Section 224 of Indian Contract Act, 1872.</h1> Under Section 224 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an employer is not liable to indemnify an agent for the consequences of committing a criminal act, even if there was an express or implied promise to do so. For instance, if an employer hires someone to commit assault or publish defamatory content, and promises to cover any resulting damages or legal costs, the employer is not responsible for indemnifying the agent against those consequences. This provision underscores that agreements to indemnify for illegal acts are unenforceable.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
