Misrepresentation in contract law can render agreements voidable when false assertions or misleading conduct induce consent. Misrepresentation comprises three categories: a positive assertion lacking warranted information that is untrue though believed true; a breach of duty that, without intent to deceive, gains advantage by misleading another to their prejudice; and conduct that, even innocently, induces a party to mistake the substance of the contract's subject-matter.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Misrepresentation in contract law can render agreements voidable when false assertions or misleading conduct induce consent.
Misrepresentation comprises three categories: a positive assertion lacking warranted information that is untrue though believed true; a breach of duty that, without intent to deceive, gains advantage by misleading another to their prejudice; and conduct that, even innocently, induces a party to mistake the substance of the contract's subject-matter.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
