Constitutional review limitation: Supreme Court will not assess State law validity in fundamental-rights petitions unless Central law validity is raised. Insertion of Article 32-A conditions the Supreme Court's review in fundamental-rights petitions: the Court shall not consider the constitutional validity of any State law in proceedings under the fundamental-rights remedy unless the constitutional validity of any Central law is also in issue in those proceedings.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Constitutional review limitation: Supreme Court will not assess State law validity in fundamental-rights petitions unless Central law validity is raised.
Insertion of Article 32-A conditions the Supreme Court's review in fundamental-rights petitions: the Court shall not consider the constitutional validity of any State law in proceedings under the fundamental-rights remedy unless the constitutional validity of any Central law is also in issue in those proceedings.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
