Review of Registrar decisions subject to deposit requirement and strict time limit, with extension for sufficient cause. The amendment empowers the Central Registrar to review his decisions under the specified clauses of sub section (1) of section 94 on application by any party, but places two conditions on review: an application against a recovery certificate is not permitted unless the applicant deposits with the concerned society fifty per cent. of the recoverable dues, and no application for review shall be entertained if filed after sixty days from receipt of the decision or order, subject to the Central Registrar's discretion to admit late applications on proof of sufficient cause.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Review of Registrar decisions subject to deposit requirement and strict time limit, with extension for sufficient cause.
The amendment empowers the Central Registrar to review his decisions under the specified clauses of sub section (1) of section 94 on application by any party, but places two conditions on review: an application against a recovery certificate is not permitted unless the applicant deposits with the concerned society fifty per cent. of the recoverable dues, and no application for review shall be entertained if filed after sixty days from receipt of the decision or order, subject to the Central Registrar's discretion to admit late applications on proof of sufficient cause.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.