Competition Act, 2002 Chapter II Prohibition of certain agreements, abuse of dominant position and regulation of combinations (Prohibition of agreements)
Contents
Notifications
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Plus +
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Anti-competitive agreements: prohibited categories like price fixing and market allocation attract presumptions and voidness under competition law. Section 3 prohibits agreements that cause or are likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India and declares them void. Competitor ... Summary
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Anti-competitive agreements: prohibited categories like price fixing and market allocation attract presumptions and voidness under competition law.
Section 3 prohibits agreements that cause or are likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition in India and declares them void. Competitor agreements fixing prices, limiting production or markets, allocating markets or customers, or causing bid rigging are presumed anti competitive, with a joint venture efficiency exception and an extended presumption for participants furthering the agreement. Vertical restraints such as tie in arrangements, exclusive dealing, exclusive distribution, refusal to deal and resale price maintenance are also prohibited if they appreciably harm competition. The section exempts protection of intellectual property rights and agreements solely concerning exports.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.