Consent for authorised representative change required; Tribunal may permit substitution after revocation and service on record. A practitioner or authorised representative proposing to file a Vakalatnama, Memorandum of Appearance or letter of authorisation where another is on record must obtain the written consent of the practitioner or representative on record; if consent is refused, substitution requires Tribunal permission after revocation and service on the counsel already on record, except for applications falling within the specified statutory exception.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Consent for authorised representative change required; Tribunal may permit substitution after revocation and service on record.
A practitioner or authorised representative proposing to file a Vakalatnama, Memorandum of Appearance or letter of authorisation where another is on record must obtain the written consent of the practitioner or representative on record; if consent is refused, substitution requires Tribunal permission after revocation and service on the counsel already on record, except for applications falling within the specified statutory exception.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.