Change of authorised representative before the tribunal requires written consent of existing counsel or tribunal permission. Consent is required before a legal practitioner or authorised representative may file a Vakalatnama, Memorandum of Appearance, or letter of authorisation before the Appellate Tribunal where another representative is already on record. The change in representation can be made only with the written consent of the existing counsel or representative, or, if consent is refused, with the Tribunal's permission after revocation of the earlier authorisation on an application served on the counsel already on record. Consent is not required for an application filed under sub-section 3 of section 112 of the Act.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Change of authorised representative before the tribunal requires written consent of existing counsel or tribunal permission.
Consent is required before a legal practitioner or authorised representative may file a Vakalatnama, Memorandum of Appearance, or letter of authorisation before the Appellate Tribunal where another representative is already on record. The change in representation can be made only with the written consent of the existing counsel or representative, or, if consent is refused, with the Tribunal's permission after revocation of the earlier authorisation on an application served on the counsel already on record. Consent is not required for an application filed under sub-section 3 of section 112 of the Act.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
