Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Acts & Rules
of of All Acts & Rules
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>44th Amendment Act, 1978: Preventive Detention Over Two Months Requires Advisory Board Approval; Jurisdiction Clarified for Detention Orders.</h1> Article 22 of the Constitution was amended by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978. The amendment replaced clause (4) to stipulate that preventive detention cannot exceed two months unless an Advisory Board, formed based on the Chief Justice's recommendations, justifies the detention. The Board must include a High Court Judge as Chairman and at least two other members. The amendment clarifies the jurisdiction of the 'appropriate High Court' based on the authority issuing the detention order. Additionally, clause (7) was modified by omitting sub-clause (a) and relettering the remaining sub-clauses.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
