Chapter IX - Reciprocal Arrangement for Assistance in Certain Matters and Procedure for Attachment and Confiscation of Property (From Section 55 to Section 61)
Burden of proof presumption: accused in money laundering cases presumed to have proceeds involved unless contrary proved. Section 24 sets the burden of proof for proceedings under the Act: a person charged with the money laundering offence is statutorily presumed to have proceeds of crime involved unless the contrary is proved, while in respect of any other person the decision maker may presume proceeds of crime; the provision redefines the evidential allocation.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Burden of proof presumption: accused in money laundering cases presumed to have proceeds involved unless contrary proved.
Section 24 sets the burden of proof for proceedings under the Act: a person charged with the money laundering offence is statutorily presumed to have proceeds of crime involved unless the contrary is proved, while in respect of any other person the decision maker may presume proceeds of crime; the provision redefines the evidential allocation.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.