Decision by majority clarifies that bench disagreements are resolved by Chairperson referral and majority view of hearing members. The provision, now omitted, required that where a two Member Bench differed the points of difference be referred to the Chairperson, who could hear them or refer them to other Members, and the points were to be decided by the opinion of the majority of Members of the Tribunal who had heard the case, including those who first heard it.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Decision by majority clarifies that bench disagreements are resolved by Chairperson referral and majority view of hearing members.
The provision, now omitted, required that where a two Member Bench differed the points of difference be referred to the Chairperson, who could hear them or refer them to other Members, and the points were to be decided by the opinion of the majority of Members of the Tribunal who had heard the case, including those who first heard it.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.