Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the Constitution guarantees a fundamental right to education, and if so, the extent of that right; (ii) Whether there is a fundamental right to establish and run an educational institution under Article 19(1)(g), and whether recognition or affiliation can be claimed as of right; (iii) Whether the Andhra Pradesh provision permitting management admissions to unaided professional colleges irrespective of merit is constitutionally valid.
Issue (i): Whether the Constitution guarantees a fundamental right to education, and if so, the extent of that right.
Analysis: The right to life under Article 21 was held to include educational facilities. Articles 41, 45 and 46 were treated as defining the content and limits of that right. The obligation to provide free education was held to be absolute only for children until they complete the age of 14 years. Beyond that stage, the right to education is limited by the economic capacity and development of the State.
Conclusion: A fundamental right to education exists under Article 21, but it is limited to free education up to the age of 14 years and thereafter depends on the State's economic capacity.
Issue (ii): Whether there is a fundamental right to establish and run an educational institution under Article 19(1)(g), and whether recognition or affiliation can be claimed as of right.
Analysis: Establishing and running an educational institution was held not to be trade, business or profession in the constitutional sense. Even assuming a right to establish such an institution, that right does not include a right to recognition or affiliation. Recognition and affiliation were treated as conditional privileges, and the grant of aid was held to carry enforceable conditions of fairness, merit and non-commercialisation. Private institutions discharging public functions were held to be bound by constitutional standards, though they were not treated as instrumentalities of the State merely because of recognition or affiliation.
Conclusion: There is no fundamental right to recognition or affiliation, and no unrestricted fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) to establish and run educational institutions as a commercial venture.
Issue (iii): Whether the Andhra Pradesh provision permitting management admissions to unaided professional colleges irrespective of merit is constitutionally valid.
Analysis: The provision was held to permit admissions without reference to inter se merit and to authorise collection of amounts amounting to capitation fee. Since the State and its affiliated institutions were bound by Article 14, the same constitutional requirement of fairness and merit was held applicable to the supplemental private educational activity. The offending part of the provision was found inconsistent with the equality guarantee.
Conclusion: The provision was held unconstitutional and void.
Final Conclusion: The decision affirmed a limited fundamental right to education, rejected any absolute right to commercialise education through private institutions, and invalidated the Andhra Pradesh rule permitting merit-irrelevant management admissions.
Ratio Decidendi: Article 21 includes a fundamental right to free education for children up to 14 years, while private educational institutions seeking recognition or affiliation must satisfy constitutional standards of merit, fairness and non-commercialisation.