University-affiliated colleges and technical education approvals depended on statutory classification and valid laying of regulations.

Affiliated colleges were not required to obtain separate approval merely because they ran the courses under university affiliation, as the statutory scheme distinguished universities from technical institutions. The Master of Computer Applications course was treated as technical education, while the Master of Business Administration course was not shown to fall within that definition. The amended 2000 regulations were unenforceable because they were not laid before Parliament as mandatorily required, and delegated legislation must comply with the prescribed laying procedure.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether colleges affiliated to universities were required to obtain separate approval from the All India Council for Technical Education for running the courses in question. (ii) Whether the Master of Computer Applications course and the Master of Business Administration course fell within the definition of technical education. (iii) Whether the amended regulations of 2000, introducing the courses within the regulatory fold, were invalid for not being laid before Parliament.

Issue (i): Whether colleges affiliated to universities were required to obtain separate approval from the All India Council for Technical Education for running the courses in question.

Analysis: The statutory scheme distinguished between a university and a technical institution. A technical institution was defined as an institution, not being a university, offering technical education, while the powers of the Council under the Act included granting approval for new technical institutions and new courses. The University Grants Commission Act also recognised the university structure and the regulation of affiliated colleges through the university framework. On that construction, the role of the technical education regulator, in relation to universities and their affiliated colleges, was not one of direct supervisory control in the manner asserted against the appellants.

Conclusion: The affiliated colleges were not required to seek separate approval from the All India Council for Technical Education merely because they conducted the courses under university affiliation.

Issue (ii): Whether the Master of Computer Applications course and the Master of Business Administration course fell within the definition of technical education.

Analysis: The expression "technical education" was held to be wide enough to include the Master of Computer Applications course, having regard to the meaning of engineering and technology and the nature of the course. At the same time, no material was shown to treat the Master of Business Administration course as technical education within the statutory definition. The Court therefore separated the two courses for legal classification.

Conclusion: The Master of Computer Applications course was held to be technical education, while the Master of Business Administration course was held not to be technical education.

Issue (iii): Whether the amended regulations of 2000, introducing the courses within the regulatory fold, were invalid for not being laid before Parliament.

Analysis: The Act required every rule and regulation to be laid before each House of Parliament for the prescribed period. Where a statute prescribes the mode of doing an act, that mode must be followed. As the amended regulations were not shown to have been laid as required, the amendment suffered from procedural invalidity and could not be enforced against the appellants.

Conclusion: The amended regulations of 2000 were invalid in law for non-compliance with the mandatory laying requirement.

Final Conclusion: The common judgment of the High Court was set aside, and the appellants were granted relief from the requirement of obtaining approval from the regulatory authority for the courses in question.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory framework excludes universities from direct approval control and requires mandatory laying of delegated legislation before Parliament, affiliated colleges cannot be compelled to obtain separate approval on the basis of an invalidly amended regulation.

---