Supreme Court Invalidates Disciplinary Decision Due to Bias, Directs Appeal to Ensure Impartial Adjudication

The Supreme Court invalidated the Disciplinary Committee's decision against the Appellant due to bias arising from the Principal's involvement. The Court directed the Appellant to appeal to the Punjab School Education Tribunal for a fair adjudication within three months, emphasizing the importance of impartiality in administrative decisions. The Court clarified the maintainability of a writ petition against private bodies performing public functions, overturning the High Court's dismissal on this ground.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Legality of disciplinary proceedings against the Appellant.
2. Maintainability of writ petition under Article 226 against a private unaided educational institution.
3. Alleged bias in the Disciplinary Committee.
4. Appropriate forum for adjudication of the dispute.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Legality of Disciplinary Proceedings Against the Appellant:
The Appellant, an Administrative Officer at DAV Public School, was accused of misconduct by a colleague, leading to a warning letter and subsequent demotion and transfer without a hearing. Further complaints resulted in a charge-sheet and an inquiry, culminating in the Appellant's removal from service. The Appellant contended that the disciplinary process was flawed due to bias, particularly the involvement of the Principal, Smt. Neera Sharma, who participated as a witness and a member of the Disciplinary Committee. The Supreme Court held that the participation of Smt. Neera Sharma in the Disciplinary Committee violated the principle that "no person can be a Judge in his own cause," thus invalidating the Committee's decision.

2. Maintainability of Writ Petition Under Article 226 Against a Private Unaided Educational Institution:
The Appellant argued that the writ petition was maintainable under Article 226 as the Respondent school performed public functions by providing education. The High Court initially dismissed the petition, stating that the school was not an instrumentality of the State and suggested a civil suit as an alternative remedy. The Supreme Court, referencing judgments in Andi Mukta Sadguru Shree Muktajee Vandas Swami Suvarna Jayanti Mahotsav Smarak Trust and Zee Telefilms Ltd., clarified that a writ petition is maintainable against private bodies performing public duties. Thus, the High Court's dismissal on this ground was incorrect.

3. Alleged Bias in the Disciplinary Committee:
The Appellant claimed that the disciplinary proceedings were biased due to the involvement of the Principal, who had a personal interest in the case. The Supreme Court agreed, noting that the Principal's dual role as a witness and a Disciplinary Committee member compromised the fairness of the proceedings. The Court emphasized that justice must not only be done but also appear to be done, and actual and demonstrable fair play must be the hallmark of administrative and quasi-judicial decisions.

4. Appropriate Forum for Adjudication of the Dispute:
The Supreme Court noted that the High Court dismissed the writ petition partly due to the presence of disputed facts, suggesting that a civil suit would be more appropriate. However, the Supreme Court highlighted the establishment of the Punjab School Education Tribunal, which is empowered to hear appeals from unaided private educational institutions. The Court directed the Appellant to file an appeal with this Tribunal, ensuring that the appeal would not be dismissed on the ground of limitation and would be decided on merits within three months.

Conclusion:
The Supreme Court set aside the judgments of the Single Judge and the Division Bench of the High Court. It quashed the Disciplinary Committee's decision due to the Principal's biased involvement and directed the Appellant to file an appeal with the Punjab School Education Tribunal. The Tribunal was instructed to decide the appeal on merits, without being influenced by the previous Disciplinary Committee's findings or the limitation period.

---