Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a purchaser of tanning bark specified in the turnover rules is a dealer liable to tax on the purchase price when the bark is consumed in the manufacturing business and not resold as such.
Analysis: The definition of dealer under the governing sales tax law requires engagement in the business of buying, selling or supplying goods. Business in a taxing statute imports an organised commercial activity carried on with a profit motive. It is not necessary that the dealer must buy and sell the identical commodity. A person who buys a commodity in the course of trade and consumes it in the manufacture of another saleable article remains within the definition if the purchase is part of the integrated commercial activity undertaken for profit. The rule taxing purchase turnover of tanning bark is therefore attracted when the commodity is bought in the course of the business, even though it is used up in the tannery.
Conclusion: The respondents were liable to be treated as dealers in respect of the tanning bark and the purchase price formed part of the taxable turnover.
Final Conclusion: The exclusion granted by the High Court was unsustainable and the assessment made by the taxing authorities stood restored.
Ratio Decidendi: A commodity specified in a purchase-turnover rule is taxable when bought as part of a commercial activity carried on with a profit motive, even if the commodity is consumed in manufacturing another saleable product rather than resold in the same form.