Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (12) TMI 288 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal granted for Section 14A disallowance, detailed order required for expenditure examination The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and directing the AO to re-examine the disallowance ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Appeal granted for Section 14A disallowance, detailed order required for expenditure examination

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and directing the AO to re-examine the disallowance under Section 14A. The AO was instructed to pass a detailed order considering the observations and precedents discussed, requiring the assessee to provide relevant expenditure details. The Tribunal emphasized a thorough examination of expenses and adherence to judicial principles, including the application of Rule 8D from AY 2008-09.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                            2. Business activity and eligibility for deduction of business expenses.
                            3. Applicability of Section 14A when no exempt income is earned.
                            4. Computation of disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Rules.

                            Detailed Analysis of the Judgment:

                            1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
                            The primary issue was the disallowance of Rs. 8,52,43,836/- by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The AO observed that the assessee company made significant investments to acquire controlling interest in Ambuja Cement India Ltd. and incurred substantial expenses. The AO concluded that since the investment was made to earn dividend income (which is exempt), the related expenses were not allowable as deductions. The AO relied on various judicial precedents to support the disallowance, which was later upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].

                            2. Business Activity and Eligibility for Deduction of Business Expenses:
                            The assessee argued that it was engaged in business activities, including making investments to acquire controlling interests, and the related expenses were revenue in nature. However, the AO and CIT(A) found that the assessee did not carry out any business activity other than the single investment in shares, which did not constitute a business activity with a profit motive. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's finding that the primary purpose of the investment was to earn dividend income, and hence, the expenses were not deductible under Section 28 of the Act.

                            3. Applicability of Section 14A When No Exempt Income is Earned:
                            The assessee contended that Section 14A should not apply since no exempt income (dividend) was earned during the year. However, the CIT(A) rejected this argument, stating that Section 14A disallows expenditure incurred in relation to income that does not form part of the total income, regardless of whether such income is earned during the year. The CIT(A) relied on the Special Bench decision in Cheminvest Ltd. v. ITO, which held that disallowance under Section 14A is applicable even if no exempt income is earned.

                            4. Computation of Disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Rules:
                            The assessee argued that if any disallowance were to be made, it should be computed as per the formula prescribed in Rule 8D(2)(iii). However, the AO disallowed the entire expenses without analyzing the nature of each expense item. The CIT(A) supported this approach, stating that since the entire expenditure was attributable to earning exempt income, the AO's action was justified. The Tribunal, however, noted that the AO did not examine the accounts of the assessee to determine the correctness of the claim and directed the AO to re-examine the issue, following the principles laid down in judicial precedents, including the decision of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT, which held that Rule 8D applies prospectively from AY 2008-09.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the order of the CIT(A) and directing the AO to re-examine the issue of disallowance under Section 14A afresh, in light of the observations and judicial precedents discussed. The AO was instructed to pass a speaking order, giving reasons for satisfaction or otherwise, and the assessee was directed to furnish all relevant details of expenditure incurred in managing and supervising the investments.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found