Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's holding of the shares was an investment or stock-in-trade, and whether the sales of those shares were genuine so as to permit deduction of the resulting loss.
Analysis: The character of a shareholding for tax purposes is not a pure question of fact but a mixed question of law and fact. In determining whether a transaction is part of trade, relevant considerations include the subject-matter, period of holding, frequency of similar transactions, surrounding circumstances of sale, and motive. The assessee had bought and sold shares and securities on several occasions before and after the relevant year, and the purchase and sale of the Vanguard shares were not isolated. On the facts, the only reasonable inference was that the shares were held and dealt with as part of a business in shares with a commercial motive, and not merely as an investment. As to genuineness, the circumstances relied on by the revenue created suspicion but did not establish that the sales were sham transactions. The sale proceeds were actually received through brokers and banking channels, and there was no positive material to show that no real sale took place.
Conclusion: The shares formed part of the assessee's stock-in-trade, the sales were genuine, and the loss was deductible; the answer was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the surrounding facts show commercial dealing in shares, the transaction is to be treated as trade notwithstanding an asserted investment character or a fiscal motive, and a factual finding of non-genuineness cannot stand when it is unsupported by the primary circumstances of the actual sale.