Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the petitioner institute was an educational institution or fell within the residuary limb of charitable purpose as advancement of any other object of general public utility under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The institute's main and dominant function under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 was to regulate the profession of chartered accountants, conduct examinations, prescribe qualifications, maintain standards, and exercise disciplinary control. Its coaching, training, and post-qualification courses were held to be only ancillary to its statutory and regulatory objects. The term "education" in section 2(15) was construed in the limited sense of systematic instruction or formal schooling, and the institute's activities did not answer that description. The institution therefore fell under the sixth limb of section 2(15), namely advancement of any other object of general public utility.
Conclusion: The institute was not held to be an educational institution; it was held to fall within the residuary charitable category of advancement of any other object of general public utility.
Ratio Decidendi: An institution whose dominant statutory function is regulation of a profession, and whose teaching or coaching activities are merely incidental, does not become an educational institution for section 2(15) purposes.